![mr and mrs smith unrated version run time mr and mrs smith unrated version run time](https://www.avforums.com/image.php?imageparameters=movies/images/media/7958/capture4.jpg)
However I'm pretty certain this is in the original film as I remember seeing it. It's mentioned that one of the scenes added to the unrated version is a bit where John's friend wakes up to see the two assignments for John and Jane Smith. I have a problem with a couple of the items in this section.
Elsan 02:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Differences between versions Mentionnes it on IRC and was reverted back to previous summary. This is direct rip-off from this page and looks like promo material. This reads more like promotional material than anything else. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 01:09, 13 February 2006 (UTC) NPOV? The "when they are assigned" shows up twice, and it is not clear what is going on. When they are assigned the same target and essentially cancel out each other's mission, they end up trading shots at each other (literally and figuratively) when they are assigned to assassinate one another. I wonder is somebody could explain better this sentence: This page, dated 4 months later, April 7th, 2005, shows the "first look" at the final poster - gun and garter. Perhaps more concrete proof: this page, dated December 3rd, 2004, proclaims the "first ever look" at the two teaser posters - no gun, no garter.
MR AND MRS SMITH UNRATED VERSION RUN TIME MOVIE
The version without the gun, here, is listed as "Version 2" (and it's obviously an early "teaser" poster, as it doesn't have the full title of the movie or a date), and the version with the gun (full title, and obviously a conbination of the original character posters) can be found here, listed as "Version 3" (look in the URLs). The Thursday, April 7th entry says that this newest, final poster "basically merges the two earlier character posters - and gives them guns". Can anyone provide proof one way or the other? 23skidoo 22:01, 19 October 2005 (UTC) In the edit in question I have removed the comment that the gunless version was censored but I think it was. Does anyone know what went on here - was the gun airbrushed out (my contention, having had the pleasure of viewing rather close-up a 20-foot print of the poster at a theatre), or was the gun CGI'd later? I don't believe it was two different photos as her face and pose are absolutely identical in both versions. Either way, it is clearly two versions of the same image.